Find a Lawyer

SHAHEENA AKHTAR versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Article 44 Writing Request Alternatives to the replacement scope of employees The applicant's position was that the department was on the verge of canceling the exchange order due to political pressure, while the department held that the applicant was using political pressure. Has issued an exchange order. Employees will be subject to the terms and conditions of service and if any government employee is affected and there is a violation of any policy or rules, the appropriate forum for redress of service tribunal matters in terms of terms and conditions of service. Could not be provoked. If a government employee was exchanged for a policy violation through a writ petition, then there was an alternative way for an employee to approach the service tribunal instead of filing a writ petition by HC Wright. Was restricted.

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• Engr. AWAIS SAMAD v. AJ&K GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary 2014 PLC(CS) 846
• SAIF ALI KHAN v. KHAN MUHAMMAD KHAN 2014 CLC 874
• BAAZ v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 YLR 889
• ALI ZAIN-UL-ABADEEN v. CONTROLLING AUTHORITY AJ&K BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, MIRPUR 2014 CLC 890
• MUHAMMAD YOUNAS v. UMAR HAYAT 2014 CLC 914
• Ch. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT, AJK, BHIMBER 2014 CLD 948
• Prof. Dr. KHALID MAHMOOD v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad 2014 PLC(CS) 968
• MUHAMMAD NAJEEB v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE HAJERA 2014 CLC 973

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

divorce advocates from Karachi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes