Find a Lawyer

BAAZ versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Reference to Section 18 and 23 Increase in Court Increased Compensation The referee judge raised the compensation price to Rs.2,00,000 per kanal, with the required acquisition charges @ 15 Val accuracy though WAPDA was implemented but it was sought. Who has the right to defend this decision. The order was set aside and the case was remanded for re-decision.

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• TAXATION OFFICER/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX KOTLI A.K. v. SAID AKBAR 2014 PTD 793
• ANWAR BEGUM v. COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, MANGLA DAM RAISING PROJECT, MIRPUR 2014 MLD 840
• Engr. AWAIS SAMAD v. AJ&K GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary 2014 PLC(CS) 846
• SAIF ALI KHAN v. KHAN MUHAMMAD KHAN 2014 CLC 874
• ALI ZAIN-UL-ABADEEN v. CONTROLLING AUTHORITY AJ&K BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, MIRPUR 2014 CLC 890
• SHAHEENA AKHTAR v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 PLC(CS) 912
• MUHAMMAD YOUNAS v. UMAR HAYAT 2014 CLC 914
• Ch. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT, AJK, BHIMBER 2014 CLD 948

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

law firms from Usta Mohammad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes