ANWAR BEGUM versus COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, MANGLA DAM RAISING PROJECT, MIRPUR
Section 18 and 4 court reimbursement increase The referee judge increased the compensation price to Rs 2 lakh 90 thousand, while Rs 1,40,000 for Major Doom, for Banal Kadim, to each kin property market. Was to be obtained at market rate and the collector was not. To consider not only its present potential value but also its future potential utilization compensation, neither the market value of the acquired land has to consider the potential value of publicly acquired land. For future use, the purpose of such land for any financial purpose for which it was proposed to acquire land was ignored while the value of the same land was proposed to be determined. That was not able to be used in the near future. Under section 4 of Land Acquisition A, the financial objective obtained at the time of notification was to ascertain the market value of this land in order to obtain the collector's land. CT, 1894 The mistake was not made by the Collector Land Acquisition Referee Judge regarding the market value of the land received but the amount of compensation was increased without explaining the compensation. Sales deadlines and mutation entries will be helpful for the current market value. If the value of the land was misapplied under the arid category, the plaintiffs were entitled to an additional amount of Rs. 15,08,000 and necessary acquisition charges on the appeal of the plaintiff. Was accepted while in the circumstances Wapda was dismissed by the defendant
