Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD YASEEN

Article 18 (2) Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Title of Land Acquired Land Referred to the Court, Determining the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal The applicant's contention was that the dispute was transferred in favor of the land. Was done Compensation was received by the defendant and on the basis of a forged gift. The court may exercise its powers to certify the validity of the resolution of any property title question, pending a civil suit for the cancellation of the gift covenant and the title question remains to be resolved. A forum forum was able to resolve the question regarding the title of the land acquired in both forums, but the civil court was always preferred over the other forum as the detailed impeachment order approved by the reference court was already examined. And proceedings pending before it will continue to exist until the dispute is accepted by the civil court in the circumstances.

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• AMEER AFZAL v. AMJAD NAHEEM QURESHI 2014 CLC 1341
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad 2014 YLR 1343
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM SHAHEEN v. RENT CONTROLLER/SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE MIRPUR 2014 MLD 1422
• WAPDA through Chief Engineer, Mangla Dam Raising Project Mirpur v. INHABITANT OF BOHA through Fazal Ellahi 2014 MLD 1457
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MUZAFFARABAD v. GHALIB HUSSAIN 2014 PTD 1484
• MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE KHAN v. The CUSTODIAN GOVERNMENT OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 YLR 1514
• MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. HABIB JAN 2014 MLD 1557
• SHAUKAT NAWAZ MIR v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary 2014 PCrLJ 1567

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

law websites from Killa Saifullah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes