Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM SHAHEEN versus RENT CONTROLLER/SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE MIRPUR

Sections 14 and 4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), in default of payment of section 44 right petition, the landlord filed an application to evict the tenant in which the rent controller rented Was ordered to pay the outstanding balance of Following the procedure laid down in the Code of Conduct 1908 and holding an inquiry High Court, they could pass the order while the writ jurisdiction could not be settled on the decisions of the subordinate courts, local authorities or tribunals, because of the court of appeal. The orders passed by the High Court could not be set aside in the writ jurisdiction.

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• SHAHROOM v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1327
• BADAR ZAMMAN v. DISTRICT JUDGE 2014 MLD 1340
• AMEER AFZAL v. AMJAD NAHEEM QURESHI 2014 CLC 1341
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad 2014 YLR 1343
• WAPDA through Chief Engineer, Mangla Dam Raising Project Mirpur v. INHABITANT OF BOHA through Fazal Ellahi 2014 MLD 1457
• KHADIM HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD YASEEN 2014 CLC 1474
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MUZAFFARABAD v. GHALIB HUSSAIN 2014 PTD 1484
• MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE KHAN v. The CUSTODIAN GOVERNMENT OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 YLR 1514

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

tax advocates from Patoki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes