MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE KHAN versus THE CUSTODIAN GOVERNMENT OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Section 18B Independent Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Article 44 Writing Request Scope Review Application Allotment of vacancies for asylum seekers It was the stand of the applicants that the eviction of eviction property was fraudulent. Eduardo was dismissed through a property review petition that was not dealt with on technical matters nor on the merits of the Innoco property's authority to issue all points regarding the person and property dispute. Has the power to make decisions that can be removed or excluded. Allotted as a legal heir of a refugee or a local unemployed and a martyr, etc. and was also given the power that he could not appoint any order of transfer of allotment and property rights, the High Court had in his writ jurisdiction. I could not process the facts or the evidence. The boundaries were to be calculated from the date of knowledge where the accused was charged with fraud, which was to the extent possible to prove it by the parties and it was also within the competence of the custodian of the Iwaki property, the parties to direct their evidence. Was obliged to make such a decision after the necessary inquiry, but failed to do so was the injunction sufficiently and naturally contrary to the principles of justice. There was no legal effect Evacu Property's passenger was unable to exercise the powers contained therein. The work was done, an unknown order was set aside and the case was remanded. Judgment by law
