Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, MUZAFFARABAD

Article 4 and Writ Petition Retired Employees Relating to the Earthquake Residents of the Bank's Employees' Bank Debt Writing Controversy of Retired Employees of Bank Applicants, Before the Law, That They Deserved the Concessions and Facilities Provided by Government Employees Were obtained. The government approved a semi-public property relief package in favor of semi, government, employees, post office and bank employees as the compensation money applicants were not entitled to any relief as they had been informed of the government applicant's notification. Were not under Under the relevant law, the writ petition against the employer / company was rejected in the circumstances

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• Mst. PARVEEN AKHTAR v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary 2014 CLC 1304
• SHAHROOM v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1327
• BADAR ZAMMAN v. DISTRICT JUDGE 2014 MLD 1340
• AMEER AFZAL v. AMJAD NAHEEM QURESHI 2014 CLC 1341
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM SHAHEEN v. RENT CONTROLLER/SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE MIRPUR 2014 MLD 1422
• WAPDA through Chief Engineer, Mangla Dam Raising Project Mirpur v. INHABITANT OF BOHA through Fazal Ellahi 2014 MLD 1457
• KHADIM HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD YASEEN 2014 CLC 1474
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MUZAFFARABAD v. GHALIB HUSSAIN 2014 PTD 1484

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

online advocate from Patoki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes