Find a Lawyer

UNITED BANK LIMITED versus DISTRICT JUDGE WITH THE POWER OF LABOUR COURT

Appeal against the decision of the Labor Court in Section 77 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 10 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 44 writ petition The reason for the imposed delay / Public Holiday Scope filed by the applicant / employer was dismissed by the Labor Appellate Tribunal for a two-day ban; the applicants / employer argued that the two-day vacation was Was announced, so the Labor Appellate Tribunal was not allowed to dismiss the appeal because of limitations. A court or tribunal for which the appeal is preferred after the prescribed time limit may also admit it for a regular hearing unless the party has reason to file an appeal within the legal period or for other proceedings. Appear. The leave can be considered as the reason for filing an appeal after the fixed period of leave, the order of the Labor Appellate Tribunal was set aside, the written request was accepted and the matter was forwarded to the Labor Appellate Tribunal so that they could also be sent on merit. Make the decision.

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• MUHAMMAD NAZIR CHAUDHARY v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 PLC(CS) 361
• MUHAMMAD JAMIL MUGHAL v. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE MUGHAL 2014 YLR 370
• SPINTEX LIMITED through Manager Personal Administration v. EMPLOYEES\' OLD AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION (E.O.B.I.) 2014 PLC 409
• Ch. MUHAMMAD YOUNAS ARVI v. MUSHTAQ AHMED 2014 CLC 410
• FOREST DEPARTMENT through Secretary Forest, Azad Government of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaf v. SHABBIR HUSSAIN 2014 CLC 538
• MUHAMMAD FAZAL v. MUHAMMAD ILYAS 2014 YLR 569
• Dr. MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. GOVERNMENT OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 PLC(CS) 585
• MENDI KHAN v. INAYAT ALI 2014 MLD 711

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

inheritance advocates near Ratto Dero lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes