Find a Lawyer

SABIR ZAMEER SIDDIQUI versus SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE

Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Appellant filed respondent's appeal after it was given respondents' seniority, respondents filed their own department appeals which were accepted and given appellant's seniority. Was objected to that another departmental appeal could be made. For the first time, the respondents were upset by the appellate order, they were in their own department in favor of challenging the order, under which section 4, the Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973, appealed. It was not possible to take advantage of The service tribunal has not been approached, despite the fact that if it is required to seek the necessary relief sought to bring its case to the service tribunal, the respondent had the right to file a departmental appeal to resolve his complaint. That the appeal was certified by the same authority. Appellant Pulia has benefited from the fact that instead of filing an appeal for the department, the defendant should contact Sarawak was not an e-tribunal. jobs for advocates from Sohawa District Daska lawyer