Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM

Section 30 (2) was acquired by the Board of Revenue for the repurchase of land in respect of which the Board of Revenue has been authorized to resume such land, resulting in an inquiry. The Board of Revenue will have to re-authorize itself. However, the prerequisite was that the tenancy rights were obtained through fraud or misrepresentation. As a matter of fact, the Board of Revenue's authority to resume such land will depend on the fact that the Board of Revenue did not conduct its own inquiry, but on the oral statements of the Secretary, Town Committee and Patwari. Based on the order of those who were not. In this case, there was no party in the case that before the Board of Revenue it was not sufficient to ascertain that the tenant's rights in the resumed land were not sufficient in finding that the proprietor's rights as regards the respondents. (Which was later given proprietary rights) was obtained through false statement top advocates from Jamrud Road lawyer