MANZOOR-UL-HAQ versus KANEEZ BEGUM
Law Fact (Divorce 10 of 1984), Article 118 Factum of divorce from wife Owens to prove the plaintiff. It is plea that in his interests the forefather divorced his wife during his life and that he is not entitled to inherit from her husband's estate. In addition, the other plaintiff, who was not the daughter of the deceased Ounce to prove such facts, was informed of the inheritance mutation case by one of the plaintiffs who provided the victim's legal heritage table. That the plaintiff was a widow and her daughter (the other defendant) was the daughter of a Matthew Birth certificate prepared by the defendant, which was obtained without evidence from the defendants, which shows that the defendant was the plaintiff. The court failed to prove his case after such an investigation. The evidence correctly determined that one of the defendants was a widow, while the other is the daughter of the victims.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Sihala lawyer