Find a Lawyer

RIASAT ALI versus MAHMOOD AHMAD

Limitation Act 1908 Section 5 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Delay in Appeal for the Supply of Section 96 Copies The period required for the supply of certified copies was to be calculated until the decision and decree. Was ready and ready for delivery until it was proved that the litigation was not informed of the date of preparation of the decree and it was prepared only after the due date as was the case with the litigation. The pass is mentioned in the mat provided. The date given to them or their transcript and entry on the Chit, but they did not submit the Chit to the Court Fact that the copies for filing the appeal were ready on the due date and were not submitted by the Defendants. The date stated and preferred to receive the delivery, a date later established, the defendants could not be shown any wrongdoing because of their error. Each day's delay had to be stated in a positive manner so that the guards could get a discount because they had not provided any explanation as to why copies were not submitted on the due date, for the delay in filing the case. Not found appropriate. The Court of Appeal used arbitrary proceedings against the defendants in which no interference was sought advocates from Baroute lawyer