Sections 12 and 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application was applied for temporary custody of a minor in the interim custody of a minor's scope welfare, which was approved by the Guardian Judge Court to present the minor to the court. And then pass it on. A temporary custody order was generally approved for temporary custody when evidence was not presented to the court, and such order should be granted in view of the merits of the minor decision without recording any evidence. In order to avoid, Batch's child had to be ordered under guardian and section 12 of the Wards Act, 1890, not an order approved under section 25 of the Determinants' Rights regarding the custody of a minor. Should be made. The difference between these two provisions should also be taken into consideration as to whether the mother would be in a position to care for her children and provide them with love and affection, and there were questions that needed proof, such questions. The decision can only be made in the final decision after the recording of the evidence. The High Court, in its constitutional jurisdiction, was not a court of appeals or revision but to intervene on the fact that the jurisdiction of the High Court was limited dialogue if no unlawful interference was encountered, or greater jurisdiction. Had no authority or lack of jurisdiction to exercise or remove false documents, false compromises or evidence-based material; the trial of constitutional jurisdiction could not be challenged in court, in the present case, recording of evidence. of the
