Find a Lawyer

AHMAD YAR versus STATE

Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Section l30l QTL AMD Bail, Judicial Trial Court approving transfer of trial The trial court failed to take into account the merits of this case, keeping the trial court in mind that the bail-out phase was to be kept solely on the evidence collected by the investigative evidence and the investigating agency, so approved by the trial court. The created order was the result of an excess of jurisdiction. Since the trial court had already exposed his mind, the High Court was not safe to continue his trial, the High Court withdrew the case from the trial court and submitted it to another court and transferred the transfer court. Guided to decide on bail. The latest application case was remanded in circumstances

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2014

• Mst. MAHAM SHABBIR v. SALMAN HAIDER 2014 CLC 330
• Mst. SADIA AZAM v. MUHAMMAD ARIF MIAN 2014 YLR 363
• Dr. M. SOHAIL KARIM HASHMI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLC(CS) 367
• Mian MUHAMMAD YOUSUF ZIA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance 2014 PTD 393
• MUHAMMAD IRSHAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 418
• Sh. AHSAN-UD-DIN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 CLC 451
• REHAN ALI v. MINISTRY OF TECHNICAL PROFESSIONAL 2014 CLC 503
• Syed SHABI HASSAN v. GUARDIAN JUDGE, WEST ISLAMABAD 2014 CLC 510

All Islamabad judgments of 2014 →

list of supreme court advocates from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes