Section 31 (2) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Chairman Drug Court, Appointment of Contract Appointment Without Applying the Proper Procedure and Regular Guidelines Legally Applicant for notification for a period of 2 years on contract basis Under the chairmanship of the Drug Court was appointed. From the date of taking charge or subsequent orders, after which the competent authority issued another notification under which the respondent was appointed instead of the applicant, it was the applicant's position that his appointment was for a period of 2 years. , The defendants could not be appointed in their place, the appointment of both the applicant and the defendant was made without following this procedure and the appointment of the applicant from the fixed guidelines provided by SI No. 89 of the Eastcode. Reasons for cancellation / cancellation were not assigned, and similarly, the reasons for appointment are the respondent's place of applicant Even 30 days of need / notice or replacement of basic salary payment could not be fulfilled, both the applicant and the defendant's appointment agreements were incomplete and thus there is an ambiguity in the eyes of the law notification. Under which the applicant and subsequent respondent appointments were declared invalid and the High Court directed the concerned authorities to appoint the Chairman of the Drug Court, following the procedure laid down under the law, rules and regulations. Proceed with and the constitutional request was dealt with accordingly. n \ r \ n
