Section 9 (c) defines drug possession and its trafficking evidence The benefit of the doubt is the statements of the prosecution's witnesses, focusing only on the extent of the recovery of marijuana, which the prosecution witness / head constable, allegedly Allegedly neglected, could not be neglected. Saw the recovery process of the hashish, its color was not remembered. He did not even know if the marijuana was in the form of a slab or otherwise the investigating officer admitted in his statement that he did not mention to whom the marijuana was recovered. And that he did not mention the number of liters. And did not even mention the color of the shopping bag in question, saying that the differences, directly related to the alleged recovery of marijuana, could not be ruled out, but it did recover the marijuana in the case of the accused in the possession of the accused. Was. The suspicious story of the prosecutor, who respects the recovery of marijuana from suspects, cannot be trusted such that special attention should be paid to the arrest, detention, recovery, recovery process of the accused when dealing with such cases. ? And every detail should be brought on the record, to determine that the entire operation carried out by the investigating agency was transparent and lost true, punishing the accused on the basis of such fraudulent evidence, respecting the recovery of marijuana. The principle was negative. The conviction of the accused and the accused of natural justice, who was charged with the charges, was set free, he was acquitted of the charge by the benefit of the doubt, and he was acquitted on bail.
