MRS. SAMIA SAFDAR versus NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF MODERN LANGUAGES
Article 199 Constitutional Application The academic applicant imposed a fine of Rs 1,67,000 on the student by the University for late submission, long before the last date of Friday, ie, December 2006 the University student Had certain requirements to return the thesis to. The amendment petitioner married in August 2006, claiming that she could not submit a valid dissertation before the deadline of December 2006, due to domestic obligations, the student filed a petition with the university rector in September 2007. So that the correct thesis can be submitted but the request is pending. With the University, and in January 2010, the student was told that his application was accepted but he would have to pay a fine of Rs 167,000, based on the semester's charges / liabilities from January 2006 to January 2010. He had submitted his (original) dissertation well before the deadline, but could not submit his valid dissertation at the deadline. It was not his fault to delay the decision on his application for late submission of valid thesis. Those working on educational institutions' affairs were expected to extend parenting issues with students and should not show any kind of hostility and illicit desire, which could be ruined. The condition of any order passed by the Academic Career (Academic) Authority of any student is that the fine of Rs.167,000 imposed on the student was very strict and against the common wisdom even if such penalty was incurred. Considered as liabilities / charges (for the semester), yet to demand such a large sum
