SALEEM RAJ versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 561 Ahram Ramadan Ordinance (XXIII of 1981), S3 / 4 was not charged with abolishing the proceedings alleging that he or any of them had a duty to fast. On which they ate, drank, or smoked. During the rush hour, the airport restaurant was also not accused of offering or serving any meal intentionally or intentionally during fasting hours. According to the rules, the restaurant was bound to raid and the arrest of the accused is also an illegal act. The pending Ramadan Ordinance, 1981, pending against the accused under section 3/4, was dismissed under circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Amangarh lawyer
