Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JALIL KHAN versus DILSHAD BEGUM

Sindh Tenant Premise Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (ii) (a) The slaughtering case filed by the landlord against the original tenant was not contested by the legal heirs of the deceased tenant, but was contested. By the claimant who claimed to be a tenant under the former tenant. In the dispute between the landlord and the original tenant in a lengthy litigation case in which the landlord succeeded in establishing his rights in relation to the landlord, neither the respondent nor his late father joined the stage because the party did not respond Did not challenge the title of the original owner. Regarding the premises, but only claiming that he was a tenant under the real tenant himself and paying the original tenant who had lost the legal battle to transfer the premises to the Supreme Court, the transfer was not Or the premises owner was leasing the defendant or his deceased father to the original tenant who would not be able to take possession of the premises because the original tenant was not qualified to receive the premises rent that would eventually apply to the appellant / house. The name of the owner's father was transferred to my original tenant who failed to establish a title in connection with the disputed premises. The payment of the rent by the landlord could not create a relationship between the landlord and the tenant. As the original tenant, these two persons were not authorized to let the respondent slaughtering the premises, in which case, they were proved against the original tenant and his legal heirs. top advocate from Bhalwal lawyer