Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASEEN versus AMIR BIBI

Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 2 (f) (j) and 15 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), section 554, claimed ownership of the property in connection with the landlord and tenant respondents relationship. That he had purchased it legally. The legacy of the deceased original owner, which was the appellant / tenant's landlord, one of the legal heirs of the original owner acknowledged that the alleged sale in favor of the defendant / landlord was oral and not through a registered sale deed. The possession of the house was provided to the seller / defendant and there is no definite proof of payment for the sale consideration nor is the sale of immovable property worth Rs 100 and above only a registered instrument Source, the alleged oral sale in favor of the defendant may not create any title or interest and the respondents should Or can not grip. Owners of premises The respondents had to obtain a declaration from the Civil Court regarding the title of the residential premises in connection with the dispute. The sale of the house has been reported to the appellant / tenant; The story about the purchase of, looks like an answer that failed to become the landlord in question, was not covered under the definition of. The landlord, therefore, has no connection between the landlord and the tenant parties; the respondents, in the circumstances, failed to do so - that is the appellant's home. law firms from Jhal Magsi lawyer