MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus THE STATE
The testimony of the prosecution witnesses has been disclosed primarily under section 164, CR PC, in the prosecution case of the testimony appreciated by Section 302 Criminal Code (V9 1898), sections 164 and 265 J: It is not known whether the suspect has any prior reporting information. 164, the statements of the CC and the same, therefore, were not admissible under section 265J, CCPC: The prosecution's witnesses, even, making statements under section 16464, were not credible, CCP's motives. But the evidence was also a contentious and contradictory case. Thus, the suspect was acquitted in circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Mian Walli lawyer
