RAZA APPARELS, FAISALABAD versus CIR, RTO, FAISALABAD
Sections 10 (4), 11 (2), 7, 8, 26 and 73 Sales Tax Return Rules, 2002 Income tax refund taxpayer's claim that his disclosure is the main reason for the summary charge Was not presented in the notice. While the decision-making orders along with the First Appellate Authority on the charge of scrutiny for input tax have also ruled out a refund which was not only illegal but also because of its scope, position and its The invoice was alleged to have validity of the notice to deal with. The summary was not presented which was originally put on show cause notice when the appellate authority as well as the first appellate authority withdrew the allegation when approving the order and based on scrutiny for input tax verification. Refund declined, which was not. Not only during the illegal and illegal judicial proceedings can the decision not be made by a court order the order was not lasting as the allegation of scrutiny for input tax verification or dispute was not part of the showcase notice as well as the First Appellate Authority. Also did not find out the facts. Nor did any inquiry nor show cause notice be issued so that a decision could not be made on a matter which was not before them as part of the showcase notice, so no one should be a judge in their cause. Should, thus, in the absence of notice of any disputed matter, the authorities were unable to legally pass the order that the appellate tribunal dismissed both the illegal and invalid orders of the two authorities and the taxpayers. 'S appeal was accepted as a prayer
