COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD versus CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD
Section 36 (1), 10, 11, 22, 23, 26 and 73 sales tax rules, 2006 did not apply to the collection of tax, the smallest taxpayer claimed that the record-based search agency Source tax liability was created. To counter this and thus demand was raised to justify such a great obligation without having to make a party to examine the records / documents / documents which have been entitled since July 2006. Sales tax is working during December 2010 and will go on sale from July 2006 to December. In 2010, both self-made and self-engineered documents, founding grounds for suppressing sales reps, found no place in the resume memo records, which led to the repression of sales reps. The starting memo fabric was not mentioned anywhere. Records / documents were created because both documents contained the same handwriting on his face and none of the other documents sold in the restoration memo were such a handwriting and therefore, he was re-written. No place or mention could be found in the commencement memorandum The sales tax demand could not be made solely on the basis of a document which was completely lost in the list of resumed records. There was no legal basis for the factory premises to be searched and the super-structure built with it remained in thin air infect, both documents were never resumed from the business premises but were later fabricated so as to sell. Suppress
