C.I.R., R.T.O. FAISALABAD versus IHSAN YOUSAF TEXTILE (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD
Sections 11, 2 (14), 2 (37), 4, 7, 8, 8A, 10, 22, 26, 33, 34, 36 (1) and 73 were not levied on tax collection and tax collection. The erroneous department found that the taxpayer had illegally claimed / received the input tax against a supplier's invoice, which the department had blacklisted, and that the self-tax refund amount was not collected. The showcase notice was issued for the same and the default surcharge also claimed that the taxpayers' blacklisting order has been set aside and is no longer blocking the field and against its receipts. Already approved The sales tax illegal, unlawful and unjustified blacklisting order to supply because it has expired. It has no legal effect and is no longer in that field and cannot be pressed into service to waive the input tax against the invoices issued by them during that period when the tax Reviewer from the Vendors as he was enjoying his status as an operative and was not a blacklisted unit and subsequently did not apply to the list in previous years. Maybe because at the time of the business transaction, the supply unit status was operative, resulting in the blacklisted / suspected executive. N order to determine the opera may not be operative were not viable revenue base provoked appeal against the ruling of the First Appellate Authority was facing Order First Appellate Authority under the law. Any interference with any irregularity, invalidity and weakness and by the appellate tribunal