ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LTD. HYDERABAD versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX, HYDERABAD
R 56 Cement Damaged Stock Laboratory Report In relation to Samples A and C, based on the incorrect laboratory report accuracy test report, Exhibit B had the same chemical components as Exhibit B which the customs report stated The chemical components of cement are the same. According to Pakistan's Standards 232 for the Cement Customs Laboratory report, the Pakistan standard PS 232 1983 (R) chemical test, ie limestone permeation factor (LSF) taxpayer, has claimed that the test was never performed. And the major component of the LSF was present in all three samples and the clinker / cement binding force / setting was lost due to prolonged exposure to the environment. Sincerely, taxpayers started the factory in February 1998 and sent their letters. To the Central Excise Authorities. 5 3 1998 Even the Collector (Decision-making) was not convinced with the Customs Laboratory's report and directed the re-examination of the damaged stock to ascertain that a similar test in the manufacture of cement was made by Customs. The laboratory's report was not made through the report. The taxpayers supported the dispute that their cement / cleaner had lost the setting properties and damaged it, as was confirmed by the Customs Laboratory in relation to all three samples. The entire infringement report was based on false news from the Customs Laboratory's report and it was thought that the clinic was damaged due to the cement / long exposure. There was no contradictory evidence regarding the date of the violation or how the cement / clinker was removed in such large quantities from the factory, especially when the factory
