ANSAR AHMED versus MESSERS ASIATIC TIN CONTAINERS(PVT) LTD.
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 After a complaint, application, resignation and resignation of all employees who have accumulated their liabilities, became effective, they were subsequently claimed for payment of bonus as per settlement. That the employees' request was not heard, the application under Section 25A of the Ordinance was submitted to the Labor Court in 1969 which was rejected after the resignation of the employees who had to leave the job to seek better prospects in life. There were no outstanding claims in this post. On all their liabilities and receipts it was concluded that they received their due due to their resignation. The employer further concluded that they had no claim against the employer of any kind which Employees' treatment, if any, will lie elsewhere and not under Industrial Relations Ordinance;
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer
