Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS versus CRESCENT PAK INDUSTRIES LTD., KARACHI

Benefits of Return of Service Relationships 25A & 51 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, the trial court's dismissal of the application filed by employees under section 25A of the Ordinance against its removal, was dismissed by the trial court, But only after filing an appeal was he allowed and the employee reinstated. Through the Tribunal employee, after the High, after the restoration, the workers filed a labor court application for a grant of back benefits, which the employer resisted because the Tribunal allowed rehabilitation, so the back benefits The application for a grant should have been filed by the employee before the tribunal and not before the labor. The court, grounded by the employer, was accepted by the Labor Court and returned to submit an employee's request for a grant of benefits which was transferred to the Tribunal Labor Court under section 551 of the Ordinance 1969 The action was delegated, with respect to the amount or benefit of it. Receipt by the worker under arbitration, labor settlement, award or decision Applicable for grant of concession under section 551 of the Court or Tribunal, Ordinance, 1969, was properly presented to the Labor Court by the employee immigration advocate from Kacha Khooh lawyer