Find a Lawyer

GUL SHER versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, SUKKUR

The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 9 seniority appellant was first shown to the respondents in the seniority list, but the revised temporary seniority list was listed under the name of the respondent. The challenge was the issuance of the Appellant's revised seniority list. The record did not show evidence of natural justice adherence to the record before action was taken against his interest, the order of review of sanity was illegal and not lasting until it was temporary sanity. There was a list that was revised or the authority wants to review this list Under the lawsuit, after learning some new facts, they should have given notice to the appellant before reviewing the list of circumstances. Should have heard, the inappropriate order was set aside. best advocate from Arifwala lawyer