Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAHIM ANSARI versus I.C.I. PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968); I was fired. The appellant was not accused of dishonesty regarding some of the proceeds from the sale of the Lynch coupons but was told that the charge sheet against the appellant was vague but the inquiry was made on this basis. In which appellant was charged for mismanagement, which was used by three people who were selling lunch coupons. During the period under consideration and there was no evidence of how many coupons were sold by the appellant himself, and how the money was realized which was not deposited in the account of the respondents, none of the other two persons. The coupon was not on sale. The alleged misconduct case was found and there was no evidence to show the amount deposited by him. The charge sheet against the appellant for his misconduct was submitted for the last four years instead of one month. In addition to affecting the Inquiry Officer, including the administration, which passed the order to remove the appellant from the job, the charge sheet and the evidence presented show that the accused did not prove the circumstance under the circumstances. Was. immigration advocates contact from Feroz Walla lawyer