Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABDUL HAKEEM versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, HYDERABAD


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3A) and 51 Wage Commission Award (1975) National Bank of Pakistan (Staff) Service Rules, 1953 Pension / Gratuity Petitioner, Only Provident Fund was given on retirement at the age of Friday Guard of Bank. But was denied benefit from the pension / gratuity which was payable under the Wage Commission Award Bank, the applicant opted for the old retirement benefit rolls under which the National Bank of Pakistan had to contribute to the Provident Fund. The amount was equal to the amount paid by the employee. The applicant did not choose the old retirement benefit rolls; he was convinced that he had signed the option form without knowing its contents; it cannot be believed that the applicant has filed the favor of the old Country Beverage Provident Scheme. I exercised my authority and accepted it. Under the rules, liabilities cannot claim benefits under the new pension rolls

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Khanqah Sharif lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.