Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL HAKEEM versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, HYDERABAD


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3A) and 51 Wage Commission Award (1975) National Bank of Pakistan (Staff) Service Rules, 1953 Pension / Gratuity Petitioner, Only Provident Fund was given on retirement at the age of Friday Guard of Bank. But was denied benefit from the pension / gratuity which was payable under the Wage Commission Award Bank, the applicant opted for the old retirement benefit rolls under which the National Bank of Pakistan had to contribute to the Provident Fund. The amount was equal to the amount paid by the employee. The applicant did not choose the old retirement benefit rolls; he was convinced that he had signed the option form without knowing its contents; it cannot be believed that the applicant has filed the favor of the old Country Beverage Provident Scheme. I exercised my authority and accepted it. Under the rules, liabilities cannot claim benefits under the new pension rolls

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Noor kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.