Find a Lawyer

MERCK SHARP & DOHME OF PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI versus THIRD SINDH LABOUR COURT, KARACHI

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section OS12 (3) and 15 (4) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A maintenance worker was not and is in good health for the past few years. Was. Labor services were terminated by the Labor Court, however, the worker's complaint was allowed and ordered to be restored with the benefits of return. A labor court order by an employer that relied on a medical certificate indicates that the worker was not fit. She was employed as a beneficiary for the job she was assigned and needed physiotherapy after which she would be able to take up her usual duties. The worker was denied further leave and refused to leave. The order was not told to her and her services were terminated when she failed to resume duties. The real reason for the termination of the physiotherapy workers' services was absent from duty, the suspension order could not be made in circumstances; ei considered an order to abolish the security or require an inquiry under section O15 (4). An order was passed and labor court employees retained family advocate from Skardu lawyer