The Section 122 amendment denies with the observation that \ postponement is not valid \ justification was against such decision or pursuer \ ie audi ultram partium \ ie no one should be heard. Only a person can be denied a hearing. Violation of the principles of natural justice against which an action was initiated or intended, is a violation of the law, providing a reasonable opportunity for a person to give notice Anyone would propose an option. Read in each clause, in the absence of such provision, the authority to approve an order or give any direction given to the authority, fair, just and in view of the purpose of a diagnostic order, which in turn causes a diagnosis. The person was sued, damaged. Without giving it a chance, its interest cannot be declared as fair and successful in any way, it cannot be heard by just any taxpayer before taxing or evaluating the taxpayers. Adequate opportunity should be provided Adjustment cannot be denied, on the grounds that the taxpayer's rationality was not a right to refuse the adjournment. Any authority that violated the laws of natural justice and the principles of natural justice was violated by every taxpayer had a fundamental right to be heard before the completion of its assessment, based on fair and reasonable ground. Adequate opportunity was an essential part of the hearing with the law of natural justice.
