PACKAGES LTD. KARACHI versus C.I.R., ZONE-III, L.T.U, KARACHI
Sections 122 (5A), 122 (4), 114 (6), 114 (6A), 124 (2) and 120 (1) were considered to be an assessment of the assessment order and the modification required under it. Profit is considered profitable. Section 122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, thereafter, the taxpayers filed a revised return on the computer software claiming to take the form of money, the revised return of section 122 (3) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Under this, the amended order is considered. Under section 122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the tax revenue authority also considered that the amended amendment order was declared a false profit and was declared as prejudicial to the interest of the tax and so on. Requires modification under Section 122 (5A). The order was actually approved under the Tax Ordinance, 2001 and Section 122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, which amended the revised assessment order, correctly filing the revised return terms by the taxpayers. f Computer software claiming section 114 (6) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 was reviewed under Section 122 (3) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and such estimation order was invalid Was considered to require modification under section 122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, as a prejudice to the interest of income, under section 122 (9) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Azh notice was issued to the revised returns to be amended or modified and the order. The order and the forms of action that were eventually approved using the powers under Section 122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, were inconsistent with the law for reasons. (A) ised review
