SUN TUBE (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE versus C.I.R., R.T.O., LAHORE
Section Customs Customs Act (IV of 1969), Section 32 is not imposed on tax recovery nor is it imposed or improperly returned in relation to non-specification of the provisions of Section 36 of the show cause notice. The registered person claimed that the show cause notice was faulty because it did not clarify its provisions. Section 36 of the Sales Tax Act 1990, since different time limits were set forth under Sections 36 (1) and 36 (2) of the Sales Tax Act 1990, hence the mention of the Subjection was mandatory. That if a show cause notice was issued under section 36 (1) of the Sales Tax Act 1990, then the burden on the taxpayer to act consciously or deliberately by the registered person. And the Deputy Commissioner has never used the act of deliberately or deliberately expressing the cause in the cause notice, lest it be supported by reasons or evidence. That if the showcase notice was under section 36 (2) of the Sales Tax Act 1990, the investigation could not be audited after May 2007, given the three year limit. And that information / records relating to the documentation of the evidence were not identified, leading to the notice that the Revenue was unlawfully claimed that the allegations of fraud and deliberate act were specific and Be specific and want to take notice of it. If it shows allegations of delinquency and any other reason deliberately, the notice was void and sufficient and sufficient to render jurisdiction under section 36 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 Should the evidence be confiscated, the notice of reason should be comprehensive to deal with the facts, reasons and evidence; Need more people involved. Theft charge
