DISTRICT MANAGER, KARACHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Claimants who were high-grade as an appointed respondents, traffic assistant or assistant yard master respondents, were appointed conductors but they had been working in the high grades for years and were subsequently employed by the employer. As conductor respondents claimed to work. It is that under the ordinances of ordinance and other rules of service, they will be considered permanent high-grade appointments and hence their appointment as conductor will be controversial to the Labor Court while handling the complaint. It has been decided to uphold this decision. The Complaint Applicant submits the challenging order of the Labor Court to the Labor Court with reasonable reasoning and there is no illegality in the Labor Court's denial of the Labor Court's intervention.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Mailsi lawyer
