Find a Lawyer

NAKSHBANDI INDUSTRIES MAZDOOR UNION versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR

The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 amended section 38 (3A), the strike notice on the inquiry officer's report dismissing the Labor Court, and after giving strong reasons, came to the conclusion that the strike was illegal and ordered workers to They should close the strike order. The court was informed of the workers by posting it on the notice board through BBA or defunct union agents and post but the strike was not declared by the workers then the workers were ordered to be dismissed. Was granted, however, the opportunity for workers to file a review request The question arises as to whether an injunction can be passed against the workers to give them an opportunity to hear in person. Union officials who delivered labor court orders to workers were either unauthorized to receive orders or were not enjoying workers' confidence. This inquiry officer's notice to such CBA or practically inactive trade unions is in the spirit of the Industrial Relations Ordinance or the dismissal of workers approved by the Labor Court under the principles of natural justice. How would such a notice be considered as an order to annul the strike? Delivering workers was not sustainable: the order was put aside in relation to workers who did not submit to the Labor Court after publication by the daily newspaper and considered the case and fresh orders. A remand was received for, and if that was not possible, they would be served individually. top advocate from Rawat lawyer