Section 45 Disruptive Legal Ethics and Ethics Obstacles to obstruction of judicial function, at the time of the proceedings, obstructed the delivery of justice by the defendant's lawyer, causing the defendant's counsel to record evidence in court. Tried to invalidate the court order for appointment. This was a contempt of court case, but the court preferred to leave it at the discretion of the lawyers, who claimed to be the caretakers, the defenders of the lawyers, rights and responsibilities Lawyers Reported lawyers' behavior several times in the electronic media. was done. And while all such news had badly impacted the name and honor earned by the lawyers' agency in the recent past, the High Court found it high time that Sindh Bar was responsible for maintaining the dignity of the Council and the profession. Lawyers' behavior should be carefully scrutinized by other associations. Humiliating and humiliating advice for defendants and the reference has been given to the Sindh Bar Council's importance for appropriate action. r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
