Claimants for suits and declarations of suits 8 and 42 tried to seize the suit property, claiming to be the owner and defendant because the defendant contending that the suit had been for over 40 years. Are old and built before 1947 and there was no legal action taken by the plaintiffs between 1947 and 1979 when the plaintiffs rented property from the filing of the property or taking illegal construction on their property. Charges were filed for restraint charges. Prove that he or his predecessor was in possession of the suit property at any time, answers to such questions were not available and the answer could only be found in such matters as detailed consideration and recording of the evidence and evidence to the parties. Can be given after permission to do so. Finding the boundary and the negative possession was to disclose the facts before the court could take evidence and the case was to be proved before the court, which was a trial court. Each statement has to be substantiated with rigorous content and evidence. Under the use of the review jurisdiction, the court set aside the decisions and orders passed by the two courts and remanded the case to the trial court after giving the parties an opportunity to provide further evidence, allowing the matter to be reviewed. Gone
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
