Section 5 of the Sindh Civil Courts Rule, R-324, was filed by the plaintiffs for a contempt of scope scoop judgment against which a time restriction was imposed with a delayed plea. On the same day 2 5 2005, a copy of the same was prepared on the same day but after 78 days it provided the stamp on 21 7 2005 The defendant should have provided the stamp within 7 days. Had not returned to the appellate court within months. The 20 days of May, June and July were the summer holidays of July, and the defendant should have filed the appeal on the first opening day of the court, ie 1 8 2005, but he delayed 23 days to file the same application. Failed to apply. The delay, delayed every day, was to explain that there was no room to waive the delay in filing the wrong calculation appeal because until the expiry of the limit, the owner of the valuable right to whom he was responding. Failed to disclose any error in calculating the limitation period, no permanent error, facts or legal weakness was found in the impugned order passed by the appellate court \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
