Section 12, 42 and 54 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872) The suit for declaration of section 62, the specific performance of the sale of immovable property, the permanent order and damages suit was filed by the plaintiffs on the basis that the plaintiffs submitted. The profession had entered. In the agreement to purchase the suit property from the defendant, and the defendant was paid a portion of the amount considered and the agreement stipulated that the remaining amount be paid to the defendant in the next ten years. They are also entitled to the specific performance and damages of the aforesaid agreement because they had spent substantial sums of money to pay utilities, taxes and maintenance costs for the suit property, among the documents produced by the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs. Disputes existed If the plaintiff accepted, it would mean that the parties have agreed to make a new arrangement alternative to or in place of the significant contract, as the terms and conditions of the contract did not make the second and third payment by the late. And that is why the principle of cancellation of the treaty was made in this regard by the Treaty Act 1872. Shall apply under section 62 of the. The proposed limitation was filed four years and three months after the period, and the defendant was barred by the agreement while it was claimed that the leasehold rights for the suit property were, however, due to the documents. Has revealed that the defendant's leasehold rights have been exhausted. Being present before the date of the contract and therefore the defendant could not legally transfer any right, title or interest in the suit to the plaintiff in favor of the contract and was unable to perform certain performance.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
