MUHAMMAD USMAN versus THE STATE
Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 367 High Court allowed the accused's jail appeal and after remanding the case to the sessions court, the stage was illegal in terms of section 340 (2), the CCP judge. Had committed Under remand, section 4040 ((1), CCPC) recorded the accused's statement on oath and made a full verdict and sentenced the defendant to the same charge, without recording any selfies and on the same verdict, Such an order of the Sessions Court was not fulfilled. As a result, section 67 PC67, CRPC and its requirements were set aside and the case was once again remanded to the trial court so that a Write down a complete and self-made decision that is required by law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Mangal Sada lawyer
