Sections 13, 44A, 151 et al., R2 la Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 intra-court from implementation of foreign judgment filed by defendant under O'Leon, R2, CPC. Read with the CPC to appeal the relevant jurisdiction. The issue of justification by a single High Court judge for the inspection and response to the plaintiff was already decided by the foreign and foreign courts, final, definitive and irrevocable and in addition Could not be reopened except as provided under Section 13 CPC Investigation Exceptions. Finding facts that were not disclosed in such cases was beyond the scope of section 13 CPC, therefore, in the case filed under section 13 on the basis of foreign judgment and injunction. Such investigators had no role. Continue this case only on the basis of a foreign judgment and decided to abandon the claim for the actual cause of your actual claim, then the defendant was not to be guided. Any evidence in this case, because the respondent's foreign judgment was final in its nature, was decided only in respect of the six exceptions available to the defendant under section 13, CPC No evidence was available and no question was raised as a result. Since the facts were no longer to be ascertained and decisions were to be made on legal matters only (on the basis of six exceptions) and no inquiry could be made on the High Court's Divisional Division Bench, which passed the order passed by a single judge of the High Court. I refuse to interfere
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
