Claim filed by the defendant for specific performance under the unauthorized sale of a dead-sale maintenance obligation in section 42, 39, 12 and 54 of the Registration Act (XVI of 1908), section 49 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908) What and whether a permanent injunction against the defendants is a claim that he purchased the land from the defendant through two sales deeds and has taken possession of it, but only that it has been stated that the change in the record of income in his name Was filed by the defendant, which was sold to the second defendant, while the remainder was still to be renamed, which the defendant did to the second defendant. It was sold, and that the sale by the defendant, the plaintiff's rights being ineffective, there was bound to be canceled, the defendant has canceled the request to file a case against the complainant. Two of the sale actions in which it is claimed that the claimant did not consider the sale of the said land in the land sold and the same was canceled with Mottawa. The consent of the parties, and the plaintiff's case was not practicable because the sale process was neither listed nor any action was taken on the defendant. It is further alleged that the other defendants purchased part of the suit property through this variable. The plaintiff's Siddiqi parties did not comply with, nor influenced, the sales agreements, and were replaced and replaced, the actual transaction being between the parties was due to change. The actions were not mentioned The change plaintiff took in a contradictory position in her claimant and oral statement and the usual
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
