In Mukhtarkar's office, the driver must attribute some of the mistakes made by the retirement appellant and the commission appellant was consequently charged by the deputy commissioner and retired as a result of which he was charged with corruption for negligence. I was found guilty. In performing the duties, in a naughty and vicious manner, coming to the office late and absent without permission, the appellant's challenging order of his compulsory retirement was proved by credible evidence before the Mukhtarkar's inquiry officer. Went under which the appellant was working and the appellant claimed that he was falsely involved in the deputy commissioner's case but his position was not established by the evidence and facts and circumstances of the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
