SAIFUL HAQ HASHMI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
4 and 5 compulsory retirement appellant, a senior civil judge, retired from employment for irregularities in committing unlawful patents and entertaining and admitting in a civil suit and in accordance with his retirement challenging order. It has been reported that there is no detailed investigation. Was placed against the appellant and there was no indication in the record of the showcase notice or anywhere else that any documentary evidence was provided to the appellant with the showcase notice service or at any stage in support of the allegations. But no attempt was made by the authorities. Prove the allegations, especially when faced with the denial of appellant's character, the accused was accused of lack of evidence against a public servant, the order of the fine was not sustained, the order of the government employee to retire. Was released and accordingly further action will be taken against the appellant. With the rules
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Ali Chak lawyer
