Article 13 and Article 13 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 13 Interpretation of Article 13, Defamation Ordinance, 2002 Trial of cases under defamation ordinance, 2002 scope scope suit for damages on dignity and defamation. The trial was held by the trial court (which was a civil court). The defendants' position was that the trial case was stayed under section 13 of the contempt of court Ordinance 2002, because the district court was only allowed to prosecute. And the trial court had no jurisdiction in the matter, so the disapproval proceedings were non-judgmental. The special law did not exclude the common law and, where a special tribunal / court was created to hear and decide a dispute under the relevant law, all other courts were barred from exercising the same powers. ????? 2002 provided that the district court has jurisdiction to prosecute under the ordinance and language The use of the word in section 13 of the Honor Ordinance 2002 was clear and unambiguous while the use of that word was of the utmost importance; Interpretation 13, made it clear that all matters relating to defamation and / or matters connected with it or under this ordinance can be prosecuted by the District Court only and not including any of the High Courts. Even the other court should not have a contempt case in its favor, in the present case, before the defendant Should have been filed by. The district court's High Court declared the non-controversial proceedings of the civil court as unlawful and unlawful and has no legal precedent.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
