Sections 365A, 148 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 and 7 took place in the presence of the Riot, Terrorism Act, receiving the ransom for ransom, which was approximately 4/5. There was a kidnapping case for a year old child. Her father and prosecutor's witnesses reported the complainant to the police without harm, and the complainant arrested the suspect after a confrontation between the police and the accused in the presence of the police officers, and the girl was found. ? All the witnesses recovered from the possession of the accused were subjected to multiple scrutiny, but nothing came on the record to discredit their evidence; the witnesses were natural and independent, who had no enmity with the accused, Only the complainant on the premises claimed enmity, without providing any evidence. The record in the evidence of such a claim was not sufficient to believe the accused's request in connection with a complaint with the complainant An eyewitness was not fatal to the prosecution's case, as the prosecutor had to There was no need to inspect every witness, nor would the amount of evidence decide the fate of the criminal case. Was caught, in the absence of any wrongdoing or illegality in the judgment disqualified by the High Court, Was upheld and the appeal was dismissed, the conditions
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
