Sections 186 and 202 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution of the Applicant Detention Inquiry Inquiries, Identification of Applicants' Request, Cancellation / Withholding was to import goods from overseas, which would be used in connection with customs authorities. There was a dispute over the matter being investigated. The second shipment of the importer has been detained and the user's identity is blocked. Legitimate authorities may seize so many goods, inquiry or inquiry is pending in this regard and not the goods imported by a person. Went or belonged to the same owners. The charges for imposing fines or penalties in relation to any other goods could only be detained once and not even retaliated. All subsequent imports could not be detained or hence the clearance could not be stopped. There may have been some inquiry or inquiry pending in connection with some other goods. Such action was not allowed under section 186 of the Customs Act, 1969. E Only authorized to process proceedings for the issuance of a notice of detention under section 202 of the Customs Act, 1969, once the amount denied was finally decided. Was taken and a decision was taken against the procedures and procedures provided for under Section 202 of the Customs. The Act, 1969, was completely independent of any action taken under section 186 of the Customs Act, 1969. Changing the address of the importer has no basis for detaining the goods, as the address change was not updated in the Federal Board of Revenue records. About canceling user IDs or blocking an importer's name through a very difficult and cumbersome procedure
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
