Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus PRESIDENT KASB BANK LTD.

OI, R 10 (2) Party BankScope Plaintiff / Private Bank Employee In the name of strike, the employee was dismissed on the basis of audit report issued by the State Bank / respondent / applicant plaintiff and the State. Arranged Bank of Pakistan as the plaintiff accused Bank Applicant / State Bank of Pakistan filed for deletion of its name from the ranks of the defendants / Applicant / State Bank's position was that the plaintiff was a private bank employee, hence the petition Cannot be subject to providers. Claims for any damages were dismissed on the basis of a report issued by the plaintiff / applicant of the plaintiff / applicant (State Bank of Pakistan). The plaintiff / employer clearly stated that they relied on the State Bank's report of the plaintiff and the State Bank's inspection report and thus its presence was necessary and after the completion of the evidence of the State Bank of Applica, matters only became crystalline. Will The strike / deletion order was deleted in the name of the respondent / applicant (State Bank)

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• MUHAMMAD YAMIN ELLAHI v. State 2014 YLR 548
• ABDUL GHAFFAR v. EJAZ ALI 2014 MLD 550
• KESC v. N.I.R.C 2014 PLD 553
• UNITED BANK LIMITED v. RAZO (PRIVATE) LIMITED 2014 CLD 561
• ABDUL RASHEED v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary Sindh 2014 MLD 561
• KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. v. LOTTE POWERGEN (PVT.) LIMITED 2014 PLD 574
• KHADIM HUSSAIN v. GUL HASSAN TIWANO 2014 MLD 574
• ARBAB v. State 2014 YLR 575

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

power of attorney advocate Topi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes