ABDUL RASHEED KHAN versus DIRECTOR FOOD, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 12 (ii) Mandatory Retirement Endorsement Report Appellant was essentially retired from employment because of a negative report in his Annual Confidential Report despite his decision to represent him in the removal of his negative comment. The rest was. Judge Anti-Corruption on the same charge was acquitted, likewise, no warning was ever placed on the Appellant's Remarks, it could not be kept and could not form the basis of the Applicant's mandatory retirement, retirement. The order was put on hold and it was restored. In service
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Saidu Sharif lawyer
